Reproducible Word Data Studies

Original analyses generated from the same pinned lexical release that powers the product. A checksum-valid catalog can be prepared without publishing its results; numbers and downloads appear only after the required human reviews approve the exact artifact.

Published studies

These source-bounded questions have a published lifecycle record. That record does not expose a result: the exact artifact remains unavailable until all required review dimensions approve it.

Output withheld

How three English spelling lists overlap

The comparison shows why presence in one list is evidence of source membership, not universal English validity.

Awaiting required human review
Output withheld

What supports The Word Index commonness tiers

Users can judge what a commonness label means and avoid treating an estimated tier as a universal fact.

Awaiting required human review
Output withheld

Pronunciation coverage in the compiled lexicon

Coverage figures show which retained records have CMUdict evidence for rhyme and syllable tools; absence of that evidence does not imply that a spelling lacks a pronunciation.

Awaiting required human review
Output withheld

Letter positions by spelling length and frequency tier

The study distinguishes patterns in the broad five-tier cohort from patterns in its higher-ranked tier 1-2 cohort.

Awaiting required human review
Output withheld

Anagram-family density in broad and higher-ranked vocabularies

The comparison shows how apparent anagram choice differs between the broad five-tier cohort and its tier 1-2 subset; neither cohort establishes universal or game-list validity.

Awaiting required human review

How publication works

A finite version-controlled registry defines the question, sources, criteria, calculations, limitations, review state, and reproducibility command. The build creates canonical JSON and CSV once. The web app verifies their checksums and exact lexical-release binding; it never recalculates a missing result.

Current study release: 57cd6e4dac25b8a1.

Review the lexical source and licence register and the wider data methodology.